America cannot fix Ukraine because it’s got its own internal issues. American people cannot hold one tyrant accountable while serving another. Hypocrisy cannot stand.
We need to rethink, ‘Who am I?’ ‘Who are you?’ and ‘Who are we?’
If the ‘West’ had the cure-all for Eastern woes they’d have joined already.
Forced assimilation under the guise of human rights may seem to be ‘Just’ but it’s juxtaposed to true or organic integration of diverse populations because it robs a person’s individual free moral agency.
It is very hard for me to work, establish and maintain relations with people on a daily basis while they rehash the latest meme on their feed as actual truth.
Everything happening in the world has been manipulated in a situational design to happen. Anything and everything the #CIA puts their hand to leads to war and bloodshed. I’m sure #MI6, #Mossad and maybe some remnant #KGB club, etc… All have their part to play in the madness in the world and logically since I’m in the good ole USA, well I am responsible for what is happening in this government.
If you poke a Bear you may be ripped to pieces but if you poke a Dragon whole civilizations may be decimated. The frenzied cult of ‘woke-ness’ keeps poking that Bear so much now they’ve disturbed the Dragon.
People should never fear the government but the government should always fear the people.
I choose to love Vladimir Putin with unconditional love. The same love I choose to give to those whom I know to see me as their enemy.
Those that impede individual free moral agency and oppose free will gain nothing. This will deteriorate into a societal collapse.
The West is crossing the border of Moral Collapse and State Failure. This same thing happened in Rome and it happened in 18th dynasty Egypt. Unconditional Love is a choice, an action of my free moral agency, and is the only reasonable and logical path to world peace.
Or we can continue to repeat history and murder each other until historians can hardly prove we existed.
Freedom is a heavy responsibility. Greed can be justified by the weight of freedom. “I am hungry and have no money, I will rob the rich guy to buy food.” Unconditional love nullifies hunger because food is abundantly available and therefore Greed then is an act of pure selfishness.
The West celebrates Greed with celebrity, monetary gain, and prestige. Billionaires are elevated to demi-god status by their acumen and manipulation of the ‘free-market.’ Typically, they enjoy opulent existence with little regard for the lesser people who struggle just to survive in the system where a few manage to thrive.
The demagoguery of the USA is the ultimate demise of the Western Neo-Liberal mindset.
The situational design upon Vladimir Putin and the Russian people is only the catalyst for a parallel monetary and social system outside of Nato manipulated and controlled populations. Hence, why Russia has stated they are now going back to the Gold Standard. Wait in five years, while the West drowns in fevered ‘woke-ism’ the East will flourish and if Putin allows for ‘Free Moral Agency’ then it will become a new era and age for all life on planet Earth.
My Rebutle to Christopher Pieper and Matt Henderson,
If you ‘cherry-pick’ scripture in favor to justify your thesis allow me the courtesy to pose a counter-argument. I’ll stick with the New Testament to keep it simple; as I am sure you’re aware considering your credentials and sheepskin that denomination, sect, and school of thought can alter the context and meaning of certain scriptural texts and sometimes not.
For Example take Luke 19:27 (Jesus Speaking):
“27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.”
How do we translate that in a positive light? This appears to favor Trump more than it condemns him.
How about context?
This is extracted from the parable of the 10 Talents (Luke 19:11-27) crossreferenced with Matthew 25:14-30 below.
Starting with Matthew 25:30 (Jesus Speaking):
“30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Now that fits Tumps ‘Modus Operandi,’ I can hear him say, “You’re Fired!” Hey, let us dig deeper, shall we? We shall…
Starting from the beginning of the Parable and adding context to the meaning, READ- look at what large letters I am using- Matthew 25:14-30.
Now that you’ve hopefully read the above-selected scripture, we should take a closer look and examine Matthew 25: 15, 21, and 23.
Jesus describes how the ‘man traveling into a far country’ gives out talents to each of his three servants:
“15 And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey.”
To the servant that he gave five talents, Jesus says,
“21 His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.”
To the servant that he gave two talents, Jesus says,
“23 His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.”
To the servant that he gave one talent, Jesus says (And we will focus here for the sake of context),
” 24 Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed: ”
Pay particular attention to: “Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed…”
In context with your thesis, by interchanging ‘Lord’ with ‘Trump’ watch what happens: “Trump, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed…” Wow, that fits like a glove, the ‘Lord’ Jesus is referring to in the Parable sounds an awful lot like Trump.
For fun, suppose we interchange ‘the Lord’ with ‘Trump’ in your ‘simple argument?’
“A Christian who supports ‘the Lord’ either does not understand this person and his positions, or supports him in spite of Christian convictions.”
Or ‘the CEO…’
“A Christian who supports ‘the CEO’ either does not understand this person and his positions, or supports him in spite of Christian convictions.”
How about, ‘the Banker’ or ‘the Millionaire’ or ‘their Boss…?’
You get the point, it fits and sounds like Donald Trump and his world. Where were we? Oh yeah, Matthew 25:24-27:
” 24 Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strawed:
25 And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine.
26 His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed:
27 Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.”
Is Jesus teaching about investing money and banking, a ‘Parable’ about investing and compounding money by usury?
Not to mention, there aren’t any details on just how the first two servants doubled their money… Maybe they bought a rundown hotel with tax structure ‘A.’ Next, they acquired a loan to remodel the hotel thus bankrupting tax structure ‘A.’ After the work is almost completed they then filed ‘chapter 13’ and auctioned off the property and assets of tax structure ‘A’ (In this case the newly remodeled Hotel minus the debts). Then bribed the auctioneer to hold the Auction at 6 AM on a Tuesday morning when it was supposed to rain in order to buy up all the assets without competition with tax structure ‘B!’ Only to sell the New and Improved Hotel at a Profit! Boy oh Boy, won’t the Lord be pleased?
Is that not what Trump has done with the talents he’s been given?
What is the third servant’s correction from the ‘Lord?’
Matthew 25:28-30 (Jesus Speaking):
“28 Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents.
29 For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath.
30 And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
I guess we know where ‘trickledown economics’ originated from don’t we? Matter o’ fact in verse 29, Jesus is teaching the ‘Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Poorer’ implying that a person is poor because they’re lazy and disobedient! And how about that “cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness…” That’s not a very nice and frankly it, according to your cherry-picked thesis, is very un-Christian of Jesus.
Compare that by READING- look at what large letters I am using- Luke 19:14-27.
Comparing Lukes version with Matthews version, It’s noticeable they’re both almost the same except for the ending of Luke’s version:
“27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.”
Wow, that is harsh! Did Jesus actually say, “Slay them?” Matter o’ fact he did. This can almost sound like Jesus is calling for a ‘Jihad’ or ‘Holy War’ against anti-capitalists (don’t forget lazy and disobedient servants), even calling them ‘enemies!’
If the Bible, in truth, is the inerrant Word of God, then we must take it seriously, when according to Luke 19: Jesus says,
“11 And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.”
And in Matthew 25:14 Jesus says,
“14 For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods.”
Christopher Pieper and Matt Henderson, with your academic accolades, one would think you both to be better examples, knowing better by not using the Scripture as a tool to condemn when the work of Jesus is about redemption- the redemptive work of the Cross. Donald Trump is a baby Christian, needing the milk of the Word not the meat of the Word. And with your high and mighty Ph.D.’s, don’t you know that God will hold you to a stricter judgment as a teacher of the Word? Yeah, you’re both probably atheist theologians with no knowledge of the Word, lacking the understanding of the redemptive work of the Cross and Salvation offered by Jesus, lacking revelation of the ongoing relationship and walk with the Father while lacking wisdom by the inner workings of the Holy Spirit… Is it any wonder you would mistake the Sword of Truth to be the Sword of Righteousness? Methinks you need the Milk of the Word of God again.
I will say studying You Has Made Me a Better Person!
(Luke 19:14 and Matthew 25 the ‘Parable of the Talents’ are sarcastic references spoken by Jesus condemning Herod ‘the Scourge.’ By mocking Herod, Jesus mimics his character, in the reverse take of what Heaven is like, or in this context what Heaven is ‘not’ like. Often many Christians fail to see God has a sense of humor and it doesn’t help when the translations or transliterations aren’t rendering or conveying the intended context and original meaning.)
“6 But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people.”
In the creation story God does not create the planet we call Earth. God pulled it from a Void- not to be mistaken with the ‘Abyss’.
The Void is nothing- nothingness maybe a state of being nothing.
The Abyss is something- a literal place.
Whatever the ‘Void’ is, it’s where this Planet comes from.
So, this is the creation lesson, ‘In the beginning there was nothing, this nothing fed on something and grew and grew and became everything’.
Science declares that because it’s not observable, the Spirit does not exist. You can’t physically appraise that which is only spiritually appraised. The attempt to limit ‘Love’, to debase and reduce it down to only being an autosomal response; the result of chemical and hormonal mixtures and admixtures is, in the least, a clear misunderstanding of what ‘Love’ is.
At least the Greeks attempted to debate what ‘Love’ is and broke it down to more than five separate and distinct types of love. The two most common are Phileo and Agape. Agape Love (unconditional love) is the type of Love we should apply to the person of God.
Agape Love is not an feeling and/or an emotion it’s a Rule of Spiritual Law.
God ‘Is’… Is what God? God Is Love. Love ‘Is’ … Is what Love? Love is God.
How should a man love his wife?
The Holy Spirit is more correctly God’s wife and our mother.
Two other possessive words apply to the Holy Spirit in the capacity of a dynastic Queen and Wife of the Father. Often cited as God’s ‘Glory’ and God’s ‘Wrath’ because only through the agency of the Holy Spirit can we experience and witness these attributes. So, when we ‘glorify’ God, we do so by submission to Holy Spirit and, in this case, the divine feminine.
Women are blessed like unto a vessel, the Holy Grail, as such, serve as worm-holes for spirits to travel and manifest, in the Flesh or in the Spirit, from one place to the other and so forth.
There is another way to attain it or to put it correctly, rather to use it as a weapon- but that is the path of thieves and robbers.
Children of the Left Hand path.
‘Don’t let the right hand know what the left hand is doing.’
Enlightenment is broken up into four categories; the Hylic, the Psychic, the Pneumatic, the Gnostic.
Hylic’s no matter how intelligent, only believe in the Physical senses; touch, taste, hear, see and smell. They do not allow their own spirit to grow or thrive because they view themselves as a ‘body’.
Unfortunately, this is the predicament and paradigm, most people begin with, define and create for themselves.
The Psychic is a person that suddenly has a ‘Revelation’ that there is ‘something’ outside and greater than themselves, ie; God. These types symbolically look up towards the sky as if God is up there in the Heavens and out there in the vastness of Space. Often, depicted as a white haired and bearded guy sitting a golden throne waiting to judge.
At this stage we discover our dual nature, both created, two distinct, separate and opposing beings and forces.
Hence the archetypes of God and the Devil.
These two groups, the Hylic and Psychics make up 99% of the everyone who has ever lived.
What’s truly disconcerting is that ‘Hylic’ people peddle concepts like empirical thinking. Empirical thought and method is essential to clearly explain and define the physical universe but if done so, in the ‘dogmatic’ way Science presents itself, a sort of subconscious (something I do not believe in at all), manifestation of their spiritual disposition, the nature of duality and opposing forces.
This condition is evident with the current ongoing social unrest and arguments over the, Rich & Poor, Black & White, Male & Female, Right & Wrong, Good & Evil, etc…
So the world remains ignorant,fearful and in a faithless, perpetual, ‘backslidden’ state (pardon the pun). Never truly growing much less ascending any time soon…
Hylics worship the Body and physical existence, albeit in ignorance, even to presuppose that, God does not exist because they cannot taste, touch, hear, smell or see it. If it’s not observable then must not exist or be there. And be sure, that God isn’t going to put on a horse and pony show, to prove his existence to anyone, especially, the demands of proof by any unbelieving, un-thankful and faithless snot-nosed brat! A Hylic that doesn’t comprehend how deaf, dumb and blind they are, why else, in the lessons of Yesu, does he pray, “Father forgive them for they know not what they do!”
Which brings us to the next level…
The Pneumatic is a person who realizes that not only is God ‘out there’ but God is ‘in there’. Pneumatic in Greek can mean ‘Air, Gas or Breath’ hence the ‘Revelation’ that when I exclaim the name of God, requiring breath, inhaled and exhaled. So, no matter if you breathe in our breathe out, God is either inside you or outside of you and both!
It is said that to even breathe, albeit even unknowing and unaware, in prayer and praise, you utter the unutterable and ineffable name of God.
The parable of the lost sheep (99) is an allegory of the one in ninety nine, who stray. Meaning that one percent (1) have the boldness and audacity to question and petition the Father of Lights!
Exclaiming “(Inhale)Yah-(Exhale)Weh!” – Simply breathing is prayer.
Whether, it’s physically genetic or an attribute of Spirit or a combination of both, one must possess the right stuff. It can neither be bought or sold in the hour it’s needed. ‘The parable of the Ten Virgins’ to ‘Trim’ your lamps and store up Oil, Oil is the measure of our spirit (or as in Egypt your heart weighed against a feather- the Eater of the Dead!) is an instruction to know thyself which is Spirit and become one with the Holy Spirit. And where the Spirit is the Father ‘IS’, hence having the light to see through darkness.
No longer blind, deaf and dumb, no longer tricked by opposites and deceived by a dual nature; physically active, reactive and unstable but being, being the ‘IS’ and is ‘I AM.’
This process is the shedding of the skin like a snake and the eternal struggle of the snake eating it’s own tail. Or the the Wurm emerging from the cocoon, as Butterfly. The process of birth, growth, death and reincarnation, transforming the ‘old’ into the ‘new’.
To transcend thus becoming…
The Gnostic, like God, just ‘IS’. The self realization and conscious awareness, the ‘Revelation’ that ‘I AM’.
God is I AM.
That state of being I AM is one with God. God being Love, One with Love, That state of being I AM is one with Love. Love being God, One with God.
Love being One with God, God being One with Love is the state of I AM.
“I AM that I AM,” is exclaiming God is ‘one’ with Itself.
In all that I know, I know that I know, I know nothing.
Joint Resolution Authorizing and requesting the President
to proclaim 1983 as the “Year of the Bible”.
Whereas the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people; Whereas deeply held religious convictions springing from the Holy Scriptures led to the early settlement of our Nation; Whereas Biblical teachings inspired concepts of civil government that are contained in our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States; Whereas many of our great national leaders –among them Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln and Wilson –paid tribute to the surpassing influence of the Bible in our country’s development, as in the words of President Jackson that the Bible is “the rock on which our Republic rests”; Whereas the history of our Nation clearly illustrates the value of voluntarily applying the teachings of the Scriptures in the lives of individuals, families and societies; Whereas this Nation now faces great challenges that will test this Nation as it has never been tested before; and Whereas that renewing our knowledge of and faith in God through Holy Scripture can strengthen us as a nation and a people: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is authorized and requested to designate 1983 as a national “Year of the Bible” in recognition of both the formative influence the Bible has been for our Nation, and our national need to study and apply the teachings of the Holy Scriptures.
Approved October 4, 1982
________________________________ LEGISLATIVE HISTORY-S.J.Res.165:
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 128 (1982):
Mar. 31, considered and passed Senate.
Sept. 21, considered and passed House.
If the oldest Torah scroll, is carbon dated to be around 800 years old and the oldest Septuagint is around 1700 years old, there is absolute ‘Zero’ proof that it even existed in ‘Biblical’ times (Whatever that is…). And the oldest Talmud dated is in 1289 A.D is younger than the Torah.
The Gospels (appearing after 140 A.D.) predate the Torah and the Septuagint and that ‘thing’ called the ‘Talmud’, which means… Judaism is not only speculative but it’s highly spurious at best.
So, Justin, what is your Academic opinion on why the Gospels or any reference in them, need to answer or be subject to the definitions in that ‘thing’ called the ‘Talmud’, when it, ‘that’ thing called the ‘Talmud’ and the Torah did not even exist? – Academically speaking.
We ‘Derkesthai’ have our customs, our traditions, our beliefs and certainly, it is NOT limited or defined by that ‘thing’ called the ‘Talmud’.
And ‘Oral Tradition’ is valid for all races, creeds, colors, religions, and cultures, even for the ‘Derkesthai’ culture- or ‘Dragons’ if one can accept that.
We can only speculate on what came first the chicken or the egg.
Civil Rights Act of 1964- Which I’m sure you are familiar with Justin also prevents religious or racial discrimination. If a wedding cake business cannot or should not discriminate same-sex couples or multi-cultural couples, so-to, Geni.com should not discriminate among its patrons, Curators included, of whose religious or cultural customs, traditions or beliefs are valid or invalid. And certainly, that includes you, Justin Swanstrom.
It’s not right to include Nick’s Geni profile into the ‘Fake Titles’ project on Geni.com. Why, because it only serves to be inflammatory (and you know that Justin, you’re a smart guy- Being educated has no bearing on honestly, whether you’re a liar or not…)
If you want to ‘accuse’ someone of being fake, the burden of proof is on the ‘accuser’. Where is the proof of Nicks ‘fakery’ Justin?
It’s your opinion and that’s all it is.
You have purposely maligned Nick from day one, exhibiting some personal vendetta. You, Justin, even said it your self, that Nick’s book, ‘The Dragon Legacy’ is more a spiritual belief or ‘Faith’ than an ‘Academic’ book (You’re opinion and complete conjecture- if you want my opinion).
But going with the idea, that it may be a ‘Spiritual’ belief, it’s more slanderous and arrogantly a violation of my Civil Rights and, certainly that includes, every person whoos identifies with the Derkesthai culture, it’s customs, traditions and it’s tenets. However, Justin, it is disgusting and outright disgraceful to continue ruining and talking about a man, you know little to nothing about, and especially, after his death.
Considering, I’ve (albeit translated to English), read the Talmud and beyond the fact, it’s speculative whether it, that thing called the ‘Talmud’ existed, and even considering that the Torah did NOT exist before 300 B.C. (I have 50 years of playroom here) it could be easily described as a spurious lie contrived by a bunch of racists bigots?
“The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud…”– “Babylonian Talmud”, published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII
The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish peoples, as “Gentiles”, “Goyim”.
Let’s see what the Jewish Talmud teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who are not part of Jahve’s “Chosen People”:
“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”
– Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b
“The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.”
– Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30
“Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form.”
– Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855
“A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal.”
– Coschen hamischpat 405
“The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs.”
– Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b
“Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.”
– Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b
“If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog.”
– Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b
“If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died”.”
– Jore dea 377, 1
“Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.”
– Talmud Sanhedrin 74b
“It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile.”
– Sepher ikkarim III c 25
“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.”
– Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5
“A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.”
– Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b
“Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.”
– Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772
Should I form a ‘Racist Bigot Project’ or better a ‘Terrorist by Definition’ project page?
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines ‘Terrorism’ as:
” the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal”
And the Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code extracted from the FBI website:
18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled “Terrorism”:
“International terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:
Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violates federal or state law;
Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*
“Domestic terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:
Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
18 U.S.C. § 2332b defines the term “federal crime of terrorism” as an offense that:
Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and
Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including § 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and § 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.).
FISA defines “international terrorism” in a nearly identical way, replacing “primarily” outside the U.S. with “totally” outside the U.S. 50 U.S.C. § 1801(c).
Of which both Legal and Academic definitions could, in fact, apply to the Talmud, the Torah and all scriptures for that matter…
Literally, the character and actions of the Patriarchs of Judaism and possibly ‘all’ of its adherent followers are themselves, both by legal and academic definitions, a ‘Terrorist!’
Should I add Abraham and Moses to the Terrorist by Definition’ project page?
We, even have the personal, hand-written confession, of Moses himself, of his crimes!- If it can be attributed, that he, Moses, actually authored the Pentateuch- Or much less the lack of ‘Academic’ proof that Abraham and Moses even existed…?
What is a myth, what it is a fairy tale?
Why ‘derkesthai culture’ should have to answer or validate itself to you, Justin Swanstrom (Curator of Geni.com), is beyond me.
Could it be, legally and academically speaking, that Geni.com is more than potentially owned and run by ‘Terrorists’?
“If you are too depressed to function, you should do us all a favor… Dig a six-by-six foot hole and lay in it.” (Solution Inside!)
I’ve suffered from ‘Inverted Pride’ – if a person looks deep with in their self and if they are truly honest with their self, by careful reflection- the truth will manifest.
If we change our view, of our self and remove that off our self, switching our focus, onto someone else’s self, to bring solution or be the solution to someone or for someone else’s self, then we will manifest the fruit of selflessness.
People will convince us through nature that we are are O.K.- we do not need justification, we do not need defense, we do not need definition. Justification is evidenced, naturally, by the fact a person is contemplating their ‘self’, in the first place.
Defense is always countered by an Offense. So, if a person reacts defensively, it’s due to the fact that they are in denial and are not being accountable to their self or the ‘selves’ of other people. People do not need a defense for who and/or what they are, unless they are on trial.
“Don’t judge me!”
That’s why people tend to hate Christian’s because they feel judged. Judged because they feel guilty.
This understanding of ‘Guilt’ is false (and ‘Judgement’ for that matter…)
Guilt, if we consider the legal precedent, is not a feeling- it is, by legal definition, a state of being. As in, a person is either guilty or not guilty, based on the ‘Evidence’, not ‘feelings’ and/or ‘thoughts’. A person’s ‘feelings’ and ‘thoughts’ do not qualify as Evidence of Guilt in any court of law. A person is only ‘Guilty’ if they did something wrong or illegal. Guilt may make a person ‘feel’ bad because that person is experiencing these emotions, they believe deep down, with in their self, that they are doing and/or have done something wrong and/or Illegal.
The hate projected towards Christians or anyone or anything displays some form of guilt on the part of the those people whom are projecting hate and even their judgement.
‘Judgement’ if solely based on ‘Evidence’ has nothing to do with what and/or how we think and/or feel. Feelings and Thoughts do not qualify as evidence, unless it accompanies a confession and/or admission based on the ‘Evidence’ of ‘Guilt’ of whatever we in fact do and/or have done wrong an/or Illegal.
Judging behavioral aspects of a person’s self, are not a judgement against that person’s self unless that person’s self affected and/or effected the selves of others which would be evident by the fruit manifested by that person’s self.
Actions equate with our Character, Integrity and Honor.
When a person realizes that they aren’t doing or aren’t performing according to their own vision (or sometimes the vision of others) or how they see their self, then depression is the result. They become judge and jury of their self based on the evidence of their ‘Guilt’ they feel bad. They feel bad because they, either know or believe they are doing something wrong or they’ve done something wrong.
If a person has a dream or vision, of what and who they are or should be (the should be, would be, could be’s) and life doesn’t deliver it according to their wishes or idea of what they think or feel they deserve; or should of (would of, should of, could of’s) happened and in this case, how it was supposed to happen, that person has already judged their self as ‘Guilty’…
So, they hate their self, they loathe their self, they damn their self.
(Been there and done that… ain’t going back)
This is the selfish result of Inverted Pride.
Divinity does matter in view of our self, all forms, all expressions of all life are in fact divine perfection.
There is no accident, there is no chance, there is no luck- we exist on purpose. By taking responsibility for our self, our own dreams and our own visions and by being transparent with our self and view our self through divine eye’s, of other selves or how other selves divinely view us, then and only then, will we find wholeness and complete healing.
We are mammals, it is built in survival 101.
This is true with all Healing from all forms of Infirmity.
This can only happen when we shift our view, shift our eye’s from our self and focus on other selves, other than our own, that we will naturally find, we do not need justification, we do not need a defense, we do not need definition, even the justification, defense, definition for our self by our self- this will be made evident by the fruit we manifest for and from the selves of others.
Things like ‘Character’, ‘Integrity’, ‘Honor’ can only be given to you by the herd, they cannot be taken or acquired any other way, not even by chemical and/or behavioral modification. These are only band-aids and not the true deliverance or healing. It is our personal choice to Sacrifice, Give and Forgive, these cannot be mandated or forced without losing their very meaning and definition.
Refusing to Sacrifice, to Give and to Forgive, are purely selfish actions- it must be noted that in large doses, can and will result in perpetual ‘Selfishness’.
We are in charge of our self, nobody else can stand in for us, a person, if for no other reason, must be accountable for their self, for the good and sake of family and the herd and every other self.
While, we need to speak well of our self to build our self and encourage our self, when in the herd, it is always best, to let other selves speak well of your self… Depression is not a personal issue or personal state it is a ‘Social’ issue, a family issue, a herd issue.
If we apply these principals truthfully and honestly with our self before and when negative projections, opinions and views of others are thrown before our self, we have the confidence knowing who and what we are, our reaction will manifest what we truly think and feel about our self. Our Character, Integrity and Honor will keep our self even if and when other selves, our family and even the whole herd reject us, hate us and condemn us we can and will stand.
This is a monumental battle and necessary win to employ LGBT people with an official ‘Minority’ status and redefinition of federal Tax-code.
State sanctioned marriage means nothing really, regarding the true sanctity of marriage. It’s the ‘Minority’ status and tax-bracket that this decision will surely affect.
The term and even word ‘Marriage’ is rooted in Semitic tribal customs. Where a ‘Joseph’ (Priest) joins in dynastic wedlock with a Miriam (Priestess or Sacred Temple Nun) as in only a ‘Mary’ can be ‘Married’ hence the term ‘Marriage’. This type of union by definition, is specifically and only dynastic. Which is why, there is a requirement of ‘the two becoming one flesh’- meaning they consummated the ‘marriage’ and produced an offspring and child.
That is the reason there are two wedding ceremonies- first the betrothal and then the consummation with proof of pregnancy. You are not truly married until you produce an heir.
And why as a minister, I would bless a same sex union but as for myself, (in order to keep my spiritual and familial integrity with God) would never officiate same sex ‘marriage’. It’s the antithesis of the word, definition and purpose which was solely for the use of dynastic wedlock.
The next step now, is to redefine how the Nation defines ‘Family’. This is a two part process that will inevitably require science, specifically the field of Genetics.
This is a doorway of all kinds of ‘Nasty’ – legally speaking. Finally, a showdown is fast approaching to prove- Are you born Gay or is it a lifestyle choice? The question is, can science prove (not just theorize) that people are absolutely born under subjection to their DNA?
Genetic validation is dangerous legal ground and one issue, I wish, we could leave alone. At least, avoiding the legal precedent but… People don’t care so when people are locked up because there’s something lingering in their DNA, I’ll just nod as they’re led away in shackles and say, “I told you so!”
And lets not even entertain the idea of Genetic re-modification…
Praying for Vladimir Putin, Dad may your divine hand be upon and place favor on him. Bless his feet and hands that whatever he touches carry your correction and where he walks your mercy may be declared. Grant him the many splendors of Wisdom and let discernment be a crown of peace upon his head. Gird him, round about with Sanctity and Righteousness. May he be aware that You, Dad, shroud him in Your Holy Spirit and be protection, peace, and comfort to him in his journey in this world. Grant us strength to overcome the corrupt evil cabal that subjugates man in slavery.
In the name of Yesu, haem.
1 My Father, lifted me out by my hair, and brought me to a vision, amidst a deep valley’ there where a river ran through.
2 God led my wife, and mother with me, to a river. Trees lined either side of the river, and the river flowed with time, through time, and in time.
3 As I stood on one bank, thereupon a cliff, caught in a gaze and froze in my tracks. As the only sound was of many rushing waters.
4 I looked and Behold, there in the river, flowing downstream, came rubble, shrouded amidst the reeds and the rushes.
5 Amidst the reeds and the rushes, I saw a pale-green Dragon, his cold, calculating eyes looking back at me; as it flow past, caught in the current of the river, its gaze held me transfixed.
6 Raising my hand and spoke I unto the Dragon and said, “I see you!” pointed and spoke unto the Dragon again, “I see you, I know who you are!”
7 I riled that Serpent, to arise from his shroud, amidst the reeds and the rushes, where he hid and lifted his mighty head.
8 Time stopped as I stared at that pale-green Serpent, the clacking of his prismatic pale-green scales, rippling in the Sun.
9 Enraged, he shook angrily, clawing the bramble, flailing against the current; lashing his mighty tail, in a fight to gain footing and cross the river.
10 His fangs shown, his razor teeth shown, as he grimaced in the fury, of his delight; the noise ceased, and the many rushing waters, were left silent.
11 There held, I, my ground and made my stand. Smoke filled his nostrils, as that pale-green Dragon, charged across the flowing river; with time, through time, and in time.
12 He, that mighty Serpent, clutched the sand of the shore, with His front right claw; there he clutched the sand of the shore, right past, beneath the cliff where I stood.
13 He then transformed from that pale-green Dragon, his continence, suddenly, changed to Righteous indignation; where once that mighty Serpent was, there stood a ferocious Black Bear.
14 The Black Bear, clawed the ground three times and began his charge, only troubled by the cliff, where I stood.
15 Short of time, search I there, through the trees, for a place to hide.
16 I looked and Behold, stood there, a Tabernacle, amidst the trees, and ran to the threshold and there, entered in.
17 Searching to and fro, there stood, in the center of the room, a ladder ascending through a skylight.
18 Did I not turn, did I not look, I did not turn and look, at the Black Bear; that clawed the air, huffing and thundering, in its furious anger!
19 Dare I not turn, not look and see, that pale-green Dragon; the mighty Serpent that transformed and formed into the Black Bear.
20 My heart, beneath my chest, my heart did pound; and saw out the corner of my eye, his claw of his right hand, about to tear my body apart.
21 And I cried out to the Father and lift me out, He did, by my hair, to deliver me from the vision.
Please don’t be angry with we the American people. Many of us absolutely love you, your style of governing, your resistance to the Freemason controlled Zionist powers we suffer from here, in essence you would make a wonderful American president. Please realize that the American people have lost complete control of whom we have in political offices, as our voting system here is now completely corrupted and manipulated. Americans are kind hearted people who seem rather unwilling to chase these Zionists out of their palaces with torch bearing mobs, but we desperately want free of the disgusting Freemasonic influences ruining our country and destroying our image internationally. We are being held hostage by psychopaths in office, so if you do anything to America Sir, please let it be this: HELP US TO BE FREE OF THESE EVIL MEN. We beg you.
We love you very much, Sir.
Sir James Robert Wright KT
Уважаемый господин Президент:
Пожалуйста, не сердитесь на мы американского народа. Многие из нас очень люблю вас, ваш стиль правления, ваша устойчивость к масоном контролируемых сионистских сил мы страдаем отсюда, по сути вы сделали бы замечательный американский президент. Следует понимать, что американский народ потерял полный контроль над которыми у нас в политических офисах, так как наша система голосования здесь теперь полностью поврежден и манипулировать. Американцы рода сердечные люди, которые, кажется, а не желают преследовать эти сионистов из своих дворцов с факел подшипник мобов, но мы отчаянно хотим освободиться от отвратительных масонских влияний, разрушающих нашу страну и разрушающих наш имидж на международном уровне. Мы в заложниках у психопатов в офисе, так что если вы на все, чтобы Америка Сэр, пожалуйста, пусть это будет так: ПОМОЧЬ США быть свободным от этих злых людей. Мы просим вас.
On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Elazar wrote: “For my Jewish brethren searching for a Biblical basis for sanctioning homosexuality, I provide you with words from Rabbis Marc Angel, Hillel Goldberg and Pinchas Stopler in their joint article published in the Winter, 1992-93 edition of Jewish Action Magazine;” Well, here’s another viewpoint: Bible Review, December 1993, p. 11 DOES THE BIBLE PROHIBIT HOMOSEXUALITY? by Rabbi Jacob Milgrom: “The Biblical prohibition is addressed only to Israel. It is incorrect to apply it on a universal scale.
This past Yom Kippur, September 25, 1993, my synagogue invited me to explain the afternoon scriptural reading, the list of forbidden sexual liaisons in Leviticus 18. I chose to focus on what is today one of the most frequently quoted passages in the entire Bible, “Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman, it is an abomination” (Leviticus 18:22).
What I said may be both good news and bad news to my Christian friends, depending on their position on gay and lesbian rights. This Biblical prohibition is addressed only to the Jews. Non-Jews are affected only if they reside in the Holy Land, but not elsewhere (see the closing exhortation in Leviticus 18, verses 24-30). Thus, it is incorrect to apply this prohibition on a universal scale.
But I spoke to my fellow Jews, who are required to observe this prohibition. What is the rationale for this prohibition? In a previous column, I noted that the Bible’s impurity rules are part of a symbol system representing the forces of life and death. Israel is required to avoid these impurities and adhere to the laws commanded by God, who promotes the forces of life. Thus in the same chapter we read, “You shall heed my statutes and my rules, by doing them one shall live” (Leviticus 18:5). A man who discharges semen, whether intentionally or otherwise, is declared impure and must purify himself by bathing (a sort of re-baptism) before he is permitted to enter the Temple or touch sacred (sacrificial) food (Leviticus 15:16-18). Why? Because semen stands for life, and the loss of semen symbolizes the loss of life.
Note also that in the entire list of forbidden sexual unions, THERE IS NO PROHIBITION AGAINST LESBIANISM. Can it be that lesbianism did not exist in ancient times or that Scripture was unaware of its existence? Lesbians existed and flourished, as attested in an old (pre-Israelite)
Babylonian text and in the work of the lesbian poet Sappho (born c. 612 B.C.E., during the time of the First Temple), who came from the island of Lesbos (hence lesbianism). But there is a fundamental difference between the homosexual acts of men and women. IN LESBIANISM THERE IS NO SPILLING OF SEED. Thus life is not symbolically lost, and therefore lesbianism is not prohibited in the Bible.
My argument ostensibly can be countered by a more comprehensive biblical injunction. The very first commandment, given to Adam and repeated to Noah, is “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth” (Genesis 1:28 and Genesis 9:1,7). The descendants of Noah–the entire human race–are duty-bound to fulfill this commandment. But the truth is that we have not only filled the earth, we have over-filled it. This does not mean, however, that the commandment should be thought of as no longer in force–especially among Jews, who have lost a third of their members in our lifetime. I recall an incident during a premarital interview from the early years of my rabbinate. The starry-eyed bride declared her noble intention to have twelve children to compensate for the tragic loss of six million killed in the Holocaust. I gasped, “Must you do it all by yourself?”
I have since come to regret my flippant reply. This couple regarded their forthcoming marriage as a sacrament not just between themselves, but with the >Jewish people. The problem has worsened for American Jews. Because intermarriage is rife and the Jewish birth rate is low, American Jewry, once at zero population growth, has dipped into the minus column. Were it not for a steady stream of converts, the extinction of American Jewry would be even more imminent. For us the divine command, “Be fruitful and multiply” is truly in force.
To Jewish homosexuals I offer an unoriginal solution. As compensation for your loss of seed, adopt children. Although adoption was practiced in the ancient world (as attested in Babylonian law), there is no Biblical procedure or institution of adoption. As a result the institution of adoption is absent from rabbinic jurisprudence. Yet there are isolated cases of a kind of pseudo-adoption in the Bible. For example, Abraham, long childless, complains to God that Eliezer of Damascus, his steward, will inherit him (Genesis 15:2). And barren Rachel beseeches her husband Jacob, “Here is my maid Bilhah–go into her that she may bear on my knees and that through her I too may have children” (Genesis 30:3). Adoption is certainly a possibility today.
Lesbian couples have an additional advantage. Not only do they not violate biblical law, but through artificial insemination each can become the natural mother of her children.
Thus from the Bible we can infer the following: Lesbians, presumably half of the world’s homosexual population, are not mentioned. More than ninety-nine percent of the gays, namely non-Jews, are not addressed. This leaves the small number of male Jewish gays subject to this >prohibition. If they are biologically or psychologically incapable of procreation, adoption provides a solution. I hope the Eternal, in love and compassion, will then reckon their spilled seed as producing fruit. Jacob Milgrom.” (Bible Review, a publication of the Biblical Archeology Society 3000 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington DC 20008, 202 387 8888