Category: Dragon Archives

Declaration of Intent of the House de Vere alias de Vere von Drakenberg

January 14th, 2018

To whom it may concern:

As we’ve taken valuable time to write this missive, we request the necessary value and weight be given to the following statement;

Concerning any and all donated and extended ‘titles’ in Nick’s own words, “The Dragon Court never granted ‘titles’ to anyone.”

In order to quell any argument, let us clarify the issue. Any claims or assumed granted ‘title,’ position or job related to Dragon Legacy, came solely from the ‘Sovereign Grand Duchy of Drakenberg IBC(and ‘would-be’ NGO) and not the Imperial Royal Dragon Court & Order.

Since Nick’s untimely death, Companies House in the UK assumed control of the ‘Entity’ registered as the ‘Sovereign Grand Duchy of Drakenberg IBC (NGO)’ and any and all of its assets were liquidated. This means that the effects of ‘ALL’ claimed or assumed granted ‘titles,’ positions and/or jobs were rendered null and made to no effect, to be absolutely clear, they were nullified and rendered benign.

That’s right, none! Zero, nadda, no, not one title was granted or issued by the ‘Imperial Royal Dragon Court & Order.

Beside the gaggle of ‘Legal’ reasons why there aren’t and were never any ‘titles’ granted by the Dragon Court, Dragon Sovereignty and/or Dragon Society, any supposed, claimed or assumed ‘titles’ are, as a matter of fact, non-existent.

Of course, the main reason why there are absolutely no ‘titles’ is dual-natured:

(1) Nick (aka HRH or HH or HRIH Prince Nicholas de Vere alias de Vere von Drakenberg) rescinded everything prior to his death on February 26, 2013.

(2) Nick died on February 26, 2013. Every, title, position, job, endorsement, request, contract, agreement all died with him and any and all Content, Property, Publication and any and all other Assets held by Nick passed to other family members, now resting under the sole authority and auspices of Nick’s daughter, Abbë Weir.

As of February 26, 2013, the non-corporate, non-joining, Imperial Royal Dragon Court and Order (including and not excluding all of its parts) conferred hands into the hands of Abbë Weir.

The Issue At Hand: “Vampirism”

Nicholas never endorsed, instructed nor prescribed to anyone, including not excluding his fans, his followers and/or his readers the practice of drinking blood. On the contrary, Nick warned all members under Martin Lunn, Grand Master of ‘Societas Draconis’ aka the ‘Dragon Society’ (circa 2004) that working the ‘Royal Rite of the Vampire’ had vital and crucial hereditary genetic requirements pertaining, specifically, to the drinking of menses in contradistinction to the crass use of blood-letting by angsty teen-age gothic vampire nonsense posted on YouTube.

Placing the emphasis on how dangerous it is to actually drink blood while lacking the necessary vital hereditary elements would cause permanent brain damage and lead ultimately to death.

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.

Symptoms:
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is marked by rapid mental deterioration, usually within a few months. Initial signs and symptoms typically include:

Personality changes
Anxiety
Depression
Memory loss
Impaired thinking
Blurred vision or blindness
Insomnia
Difficulty speaking
Difficulty swallowing
Sudden, jerky movements

As the disease progresses, mental symptoms worsen. Most people eventually lapse into a coma. Heart failure, respiratory failure, pneumonia or other infections are generally the cause of death. Death usually occurs within a year.

For More Information Click Here

Nicholas never told anyone to endanger themselves in such a way.

It’s simple, ingesting and imbibing literal blood, lacking any medical research into your origins (forget the work required) and more specifically, the inherent genetic requirements, highlights a clear lack of knowledge and is downright dangerous to one’s health and wellbeing- Good luck finding a medical doctor possessing an appropriate PhD in medicine, willing to help you find out if you’re genetically qualified to drink blood!

These ridiculous claims made by the so-called ‘enlightened draconian’ concerning a ‘New Draconian Era’ while lacking the formal, civil or moral empathy, honour, and/or respect demanded by the immediate family and current heir of the Dragon Legacy defies belief in the eye’s of said family; Displaying a level of arrogance, covetousness and quite frankly, a fascist tendency that is openly hostile towards the new paradigms current family research is focused on manifesting.

This is exactly what Nick resented most.

Charlatans.

The sheer arrogance and disrespect to the Inner Order and Divine Feminine cannot be overlooked or understated.

Of True Vampirism, Nick said (in Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells- Chapter One: The Origins of Vampirism),

“As Professor Margaret Murray discovered herself, vampirism was not the prerogative of the merchant or peasant classes but was a cultic observance confined to the environs of the nobility, often as an adjunct to rites of the Noble and Royal Witch Covens of Scotland.

We can say with confidence then that real vampirism (the Royal Rite– Rite of the Vampire) was indulged in by living beings who, unerringly, were members of the pre-Christian and anti-christian high nobility and royalty. The most famous vampire stories, those of Dracula, Bathory and de Rais, support this conclusion. The historical evidence, therefore, supports the etymological origin of the word ’vampire’ – An Overlord.

Vampirism, up until the early 1700’s, by which time it had been in decline for several centuries, was not merely or solely the practice of a few isolated, high-born opportunists seeking some form of personal advantage or satisfying private perversions. Vampirism took two forms and the bloodline descendants of the ancient vampire lords had, in Britain, set the practice within an overall, multi-faceted social and cultural framework, stemming from the Iron-Age, that never gets an airing in the Gothic novel.

Vampires weren’t just vampires, as the penny dreadful would have us believe, they were individuals and families who used the practice to achieve specific aims and thereby fulfill those specific social obligations which, since the Scythian-Celtic period of the High Dragon Kings, were equated with their rank and position as leaders and overseers.”

And later in the same chapter we read;

“As we have discovered, the vampire – as a “witch” – belonged by genetic inheritance, to a distinct royal caste in Scythian-Celtic society, that of the priest-king or priestess-queen, the prince and princess-druids who had evolved very early on in human social history and who belonged to a Eurasian-wide hereditary priestly community which had originated with the Scythian-Aryans.”

The Address:

Ref. “this very big Dragon war that is coming… ”

Nick expressed a great degree of foresight when he wrote:

“How long do we have to suffer the impudence of empty vessels who label as either good or evil, black or white, an ancient family tradition that they can’t understand, are not and never can be a part of, and yet pontificate about anyway? These chattering fools know nothing and yet their stupidity adds yearly to the misrepresentations of and misconceptions about ancient Royal doctrine, made by outsiders, in the Dragon Family’s name.”

(In this year 2018 ‘outsiders’ are determined as being anyone operating beyond the auspices and authority of Nick’s daughter, Abbë Weir)

Let no “jobbing gods who became the genii locus or pagan spirits” (~Nick) trouble us, not now, not ever.
THE HOLY GRAIL & The Knights Templar

August 7th, 2017

The Knights Templar may be the ‘Protectors’ of the ‘Covenant’ but they’re not the ‘Covenant’…

When I think of blood… I do not think in terms of physical- two strands of DNA… If it were based on physical attributes there would be no question to the work of enlightenment. The ritual of Worship should actually be Wor’k’ship.

If one were to be King by birth alone there would be absolutely no work for this event of becoming Priest-King or Queen. A King, Queen or ‘Kin’ describes a ‘Physical’ event of Human relations on planet Earth. While a Priest, in the Messianic capacity, refers to a higher order, Law and Frequency, the King and Queen rest on the lower Frequency. Heavenly Relation is a ‘Spiritual’ event describing a Priest or higher vibration. Spirit and Flesh exist on a frequency, all measured on a vibrational ladder, called Jacobs ladder. While certain ‘Physical’ attributes may be more in tune with a higher vibration, creation itself, would not be limited to the lower or higher vibrations but would be a higher or lower percentage of possibility. Meaning, Many get the opportunity, some lesser or greater but all have the chance get it, albeit not equal.

This tells me that there are higher strands. Unseen, hidden or lost… Ten lost tribes of Israel or Ten Hidden strands of DNA.

Seen the Physical – Unseen the Spiritual.

For Physical life there are guidebooks… For Spiritual life there aren’t any guidebooks.

Exoteric Physical Birth – Esoteric Spiritual Birth.

This is why Mankind and Elf kind have never really gotten along… Man has this silly notion that you can trace a King through linear descent but, ha! You cannot do that mere mortal. That which is unseen is from above. The body you currently reside in is just a husk… The question is, does that husk contain seed or not? A Dragon, need not any proof of, ‘who’ they are because that, which is ‘Unseen’ or ‘Hidden’, is evident by its fruit. Obviously, if you contain the promised seed then you would bare the fruit. If you were a husk then, you’re an empty husk. Devoid of life, Man is full of hypocrisy; he justifies himself in points of grey. While the Elf sees things in BLACK & WHITE; Yes and No; Right and Wrong and Good and Evil. You cannot calculate the distance between two hidden points unless those points be ‘Seen’ or ‘Revealed’. Man does not have the capacity to comprehend these things. You cannot trace a Priest-King or Queen through physical blood ties alone because it is spiritually discerned.

The evidence of whether or not a person is an Elf is based whether or not that being possesses the Holy Spirit.

In simple terms, A being that rests upon higher frequencies is an ‘Elf’ because they have access to the higher strands of DNA; thus those higher strands only need to be actualized.

Hence, the purpose for the Alchemic Wedding or The tantric/hermetic, ‘Royal Rite of the Vampire’ the actualization of our DNA.

That which is hidden sees the things which are hidden = Dragon.

That which is exposed sees the things which are exposed = Man

Man cannot measure that which he cannot calculate.

A Dragon knows another Dragon because the deep calls to deep.

You cannot trace a Dragon by Pen and Paper… Genealogy alone.

Magi-cal expertise is a Genetic Inheritance and is the proof of the Holy Spirit.

Without the Holy Spirit you haven’t the right to be Priest-King or Queen.

Nicholas says,

“Man is thoroughly stupid and dim-witted… and
this condition is genetically inherited. Nature
seems unable to ameliorate what nature has here
ordained. Here the idealist might argue that a eugenic
solution mediated through genetic engineering could
produce a more passive, thoughtful population by
weeding out the stupid gene and replacing it.

Leaders are supposed to be able to function at a faster rate
than the followers and thereby anticipate any given direction
the system might go in, and plan sensible strategies that the
system might adopt for its well-being.”

And in reference of measuring balance, Nicholas states it another way…

“To any intelligent person, to any true seer, concepts like white
or black magic or good or evil are irrational, childish nonsense;
both in terms of logic and actual fact.”

Let Man continue to cloud his mind with points of Grey… As to what is right or wrong; good or evil; black or white. The Elf will just measure between the two as to what is best at the time.

Yesu/Jesus said, “let your ‘yes’ be ‘yes’ and your ‘no’ be ‘no’” And the Elf just say’s, “Yes and No.”

There is no debate.
Juris Sanguinis

May 17th, 2017

Law of Blood
Dragon Court Notice and Public Statement

April 11th, 2016

This is a public statement in regards to my father Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg, otherwise known as Nicholas Thomas Logan Weir

Amidst my family dealing with the untimely death of a father, it has come to my attention that certain people and individuals see themselves as either fans, followers and/or pretenders to, what I would call, a mass flocking of online attention. In a desperate attempt to recreate our genealogy or to find a familial link with us, through their own discomfort with their own lineages.

I find myself in somewhat of a difficult position, so to set the record straight, Dad would want us to continue to PROTECT the history and future of the bloodline.

The Dragon Court is not a court without my dad as he set it up in the first place.

There will be a ‘New’ court that has no membership fees, no egotistical titles, grandeur or pompous ‘wanna-be’ theories and certainly, no ‘role-playing’ games and what not.

We are an extremely small collective of religious and historical researchers that hold no claims to becoming kings, queens princes or princesses. We are blood and see no need to hold titles that make other people feel higher up than others, We are the protectors of Earths history, nothing more or less. There are no groups to join, you are either in the fold or you are not and those that ‘are,’ know their roles as researchers.

The Dragon Court will be resumed under my authority as his daughter and heir to his works. No other court will be regarded ‘authentic’ as without dad , his genes or knowledge, there is nothing, all we can do is retain his work in his honour. The ethos of this is that no religion or set of tenets, will be started under his name and any that dare attempt it, will hold no representation to what dad wanted and will have nothing to do with us.

It is damn right stupid and borderline terrorism, to attempt to start new orders, crusades, cults and/or religions in his name. This is not our way.

To be a ‘Dragon’ you will know through your ancestry, gene markers and gifts that you are, who you are and will not need public recognition.

To be a ‘Dragon’ you will lead by the truth in all aspects of your life and above anything be the best person you can be. But do this in your own lives and make a difference to the world through doing good.

Don’t be a sheep or a follower, be a leader and give the world something to be proud of, the world owes you nothing, you owe the world for your existence so, make it worth something by giving back as much as you can.

Respectfully,

Abbë Weir
WARNING: Geni.com

July 22nd, 2015
Dear Justin Swanstrom (Curator), Geni.com and the known ‘Terrorist’ group Mossad,

(All the above, working in collusion with https://www.facebook.com/TheMuireRite- a Mossad terrorist disinformation front against the person and work of Nicholas de Vere)

If the oldest Torah scroll, is carbon dated to be around 800 years old and the oldest Septuagint is around 1700 years old, there is absolute ‘Zero’ proof that it even existed in ‘Biblical’ times (Whatever that is…). And the oldest Talmud dated is in 1289 A.D is younger than the Torah.

Academically speaking,

The Gospels (appearing after 140 A.D.) predate the Torah and the Septuagint and that ‘thing’ called the ‘Talmud’, which means… Judaism is not only speculative but it’s highly spurious at best.

So, Justin, what is your Academic opinion on why the Gospels or any reference in them, need to answer or be subject to the definitions in that ‘thing’ called the ‘Talmud’, when it, ‘that’ thing called the ‘Talmud’ and the Torah did not even exist? – Academically speaking.

We ‘Derkesthai’ have our customs, our traditions, our beliefs and certainly, it is NOT limited or defined by that ‘thing’ called the ‘Talmud’.

And ‘Oral Tradition’ is valid for all races, creeds, colors, religions, and cultures, even for the ‘Derkesthai’ culture- or ‘Dragons’ if one can accept that.

We can only speculate on what came first the chicken or the egg.

Civil Rights Act of 1964- Which I’m sure you are familiar with Justin also prevents religious or racial discrimination. If a wedding cake business cannot or should not discriminate same-sex couples or multi-cultural couples, so-to, Geni.com should not discriminate among its patrons, Curators included, of whose religious or cultural customs, traditions or beliefs are valid or invalid. And certainly, that includes you, Justin Swanstrom.

It’s not right to include Nick’s Geni profile into the ‘Fake Titles’ project on Geni.com. Why, because it only serves to be inflammatory (and you know that Justin, you’re a smart guy- Being educated has no bearing on honestly, whether you’re a liar or not…)

If you want to ‘accuse’ someone of being fake, the burden of proof is on the ‘accuser’. Where is the proof of Nicks ‘fakery’ Justin?

It’s your opinion and that’s all it is.

You have purposely maligned Nick from day one, exhibiting some personal vendetta. You, Justin, even said it your self, that Nick’s book, ‘The Dragon Legacy’ is more a spiritual belief or ‘Faith’ than an ‘Academic’ book (You’re opinion and complete conjecture- if you want my opinion).

But going with the idea, that it may be a ‘Spiritual’ belief, it’s more slanderous and arrogantly a violation of my Civil Rights and, certainly that includes, every person whoos identifies with the Derkesthai culture, it’s customs, traditions and it’s tenets. However, Justin, it is disgusting and outright disgraceful to continue ruining and talking about a man, you know little to nothing about, and especially, after his death.

Considering, I’ve (albeit translated to English), read the Talmud and beyond the fact, it’s speculative whether it, that thing called the ‘Talmud’ existed, and even considering that the Torah did NOT exist before 300 B.C. (I have 50 years of playroom here) it could be easily described as a spurious lie contrived by a bunch of racists bigots?

“The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud…”– “Babylonian Talmud”, published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII

The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish peoples, as “Gentiles”, “Goyim”.

Let’s see what the Jewish Talmud teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who are not part of Jahve’s “Chosen People”:

“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”

– Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

“The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.”

– Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30

“Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form.”

– Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855

“A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal.”

– Coschen hamischpat 405

“The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs.”

– Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b

“Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human.”

– Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b

“If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog.”

– Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b

“If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: “God will replace ‘your loss’, just as if one of his oxen or asses had died”.”

– Jore dea 377, 1

“Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals.”

– Talmud Sanhedrin 74b

“It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile.”

– Sepher ikkarim III c 25

“It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.”

– Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5

“A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.”

– Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b

“Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.”

– Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772

Should I form a ‘Racist Bigot Project’ or better a ‘Terrorist by Definition’ project page?

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines ‘Terrorism’ as:

” the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal”

And the Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code extracted from the FBI website:

18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled “Terrorism”:

“International terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:

Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violates federal or state law;
Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*

“Domestic terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:

Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.

18 U.S.C. § 2332b defines the term “federal crime of terrorism” as an offense that:

Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and
Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including § 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and § 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.).
- FISA defines “international terrorism” in a nearly identical way, replacing “primarily” outside the U.S. with “totally” outside the U.S. 50 U.S.C. § 1801(c).
Of which both Legal and Academic definitions could, in fact, apply to the Talmud, the Torah and all scriptures for that matter…

Literally, the character and actions of the Patriarchs of Judaism and possibly ‘all’ of its adherent followers are themselves, both by legal and academic definitions, a ‘Terrorist!’

Should I add Abraham and Moses to the Terrorist by Definition’ project page?

We, even have the personal, hand-written confession, of Moses himself, of his crimes!- If it can be attributed, that he, Moses, actually authored the Pentateuch- Or much less the lack of ‘Academic’ proof that Abraham and Moses even existed…?

What is a myth, what it is a fairy tale?

Why ‘derkesthai culture’ should have to answer or validate itself to you, Justin Swanstrom (Curator of Geni.com), is beyond me.

Could it be, legally and academically speaking, that Geni.com is more than potentially owned and run by ‘Terrorists’?
Praying and Prophecy for Vladimir Putin

July 18th, 2014

Praying for Vladimir Putin, Dad may your divine hand be upon and place favor on him. Bless his feet and hands that whatever he touches carry your correction and where he walks your mercy may be declared. Grant him the many splendors of Wisdom and let discernment be a crown of peace upon his head. Gird him, round about with Sanctity and Righteousness. May he be aware that You, Dad, shroud him in Your Holy Spirit and be protection, peace, and comfort to him in his journey in this world. Grant us strength to overcome the corrupt evil cabal that subjugates man in slavery.

In the name of Yesu, haem.

Prophetic Word:

1 My Father, lifted me out by my hair, and brought me to a vision, amidst a deep valley’ there where a river ran through.

2 God led my wife, and mother with me, to a river. Trees lined either side of the river, and the river flowed with time, through time, and in time.

3 As I stood on one bank, thereupon a cliff, caught in a gaze and froze in my tracks. As the only sound was of many rushing waters.

4 I looked and Behold, there in the river, flowing downstream, came rubble, shrouded amidst the reeds and the rushes.

5 Amidst the reeds and the rushes, I saw a pale-green Dragon, his cold, calculating eyes looking back at me; as it flow past, caught in the current of the river, its gaze held me transfixed.

6 Raising my hand and spoke I unto the Dragon and said, “I see you!” pointed and spoke unto the Dragon again, “I see you, I know who you are!”

7 I riled that Serpent, to arise from his shroud, amidst the reeds and the rushes, where he hid and lifted his mighty head.

8 Time stopped as I stared at that pale-green Serpent, the clacking of his prismatic pale-green scales, rippling in the Sun.

9 Enraged, he shook angrily, clawing the bramble, flailing against the current; lashing his mighty tail, in a fight to gain footing and cross the river.

10 His fangs shown, his razor teeth shown, as he grimaced in the fury, of his delight; the noise ceased, and the many rushing waters, were left silent.

11 There held, I, my ground and made my stand. Smoke filled his nostrils, as that pale-green Dragon, charged across the flowing river; with time, through time, and in time.

12 He, that mighty Serpent, clutched the sand of the shore, with His front right claw; there he clutched the sand of the shore, right past, beneath the cliff where I stood.

13 He then transformed from that pale-green Dragon, his continence, suddenly, changed to Righteous indignation; where once that mighty Serpent was, there stood a ferocious Black Bear.

14 The Black Bear, clawed the ground three times and began his charge, only troubled by the cliff, where I stood.

15 Short of time, search I there, through the trees, for a place to hide.

16 I looked and Behold, stood there, a Tabernacle, amidst the trees, and ran to the threshold and there, entered in.

17 Searching to and fro, there stood, in the center of the room, a ladder ascending through a skylight.

18 Did I not turn, did I not look, I did not turn and look, at the Black Bear; that clawed the air, huffing and thundering, in its furious anger!

19 Dare I not turn, not look and see, that pale-green Dragon; the mighty Serpent that transformed and formed into the Black Bear.

20 My heart, beneath my chest, my heart did pound; and saw out the corner of my eye, his claw of his right hand, about to tear my body apart.

21 And I cried out to the Father and lift me out, He did, by my hair, to deliver me from the vision.
Open letter to Vladimir Putin, Russian President

July 16th, 2014

Dear Mr. President:

Please don’t be angry with we the American people. Many of us absolutely love you, your style of governing, your resistance to the Freemason controlled Zionist powers we suffer from here, in essence you would make a wonderful American president. Please realize that the American people have lost complete control of whom we have in political offices, as our voting system here is now completely corrupted and manipulated. Americans are kind hearted people who seem rather unwilling to chase these Zionists out of their palaces with torch bearing mobs, but we desperately want free of the disgusting Freemasonic influences ruining our country and destroying our image internationally. We are being held hostage by psychopaths in office, so if you do anything to America Sir, please let it be this: HELP US TO BE FREE OF THESE EVIL MEN. We beg you.

We love you very much, Sir.

Sincerely,

Sir James Robert Wright KT

Уважаемый господин Президент:

Пожалуйста, не сердитесь на мы американского народа. Многие из нас очень люблю вас, ваш стиль правления, ваша устойчивость к масоном контролируемых сионистских сил мы страдаем отсюда, по сути вы сделали бы замечательный американский президент. Следует понимать, что американский народ потерял полный контроль над которыми у нас в политических офисах, так как наша система голосования здесь теперь полностью поврежден и манипулировать. Американцы рода сердечные люди, которые, кажется, а не желают преследовать эти сионистов из своих дворцов с факел подшипник мобов, но мы отчаянно хотим освободиться от отвратительных масонских влияний, разрушающих нашу страну и разрушающих наш имидж на международном уровне. Мы в заложниках у психопатов в офисе, так что если вы на все, чтобы Америка Сэр, пожалуйста, пусть это будет так: ПОМОЧЬ США быть свободным от этих злых людей. Мы просим вас.

Мы тебя очень люблю, сэр.

С уважением,

Сэр Джеймс Роберт Райт KT
Searching my roots… Manfredingi

June 24th, 2013
==THE MANFREDINGI==

THE MANFREDINGI

Matfried

It took a while and many hours of frustration, prayer and persistence. Many times you want to throw your hands up in the air and just quit but that is when ‘Passion’ takes over. Genealogy, is mainly a jigsaw puzzle to be solved by logical and deductive reasoning.

After spending two weeks and sixteen hour days, getting little to no sleep, cross referencing every suggested, possible and/or logical relation, sifting historical data and crunching all the numbers… It finally became apparent,Mattfrid II, Graf von Eifelgau-Orleans was the only logical person to be the father of Mattfrid I, von Wied (Same person as Matfrid III, Graf von Eifelgau).

But first let us jump back to a later descendant.

Matfried III, von Wied (Engersgau, 1093-1123/1129), had, yet another road block, in this line. He (Matfrid III) had, from multiple sources, three fathers to chose from: [A] Ruckerus von Wied; [B] Wigger III von Engersgau (Beilstein); [C] Richwin IV, Graf von Wied.

Having dealt with ‘Ruckerus’ and deduced that, while he could be Matfrid III’s father, it was more likely, Richwin IV, Graf von Wied, was his father. Then in the ‘Medieval Germany: An Encyclopedia‘ (ref. 2b), it made the claimMattfried III ( von Wied, also Engersgau ) was the son of Wigger III von Engersgau– to justify the ‘Engersgau’ surname. It further stated (Pg. 824) that ‘He’ (Mattfried III) was related to the Matfrid’s (d’Orleans) but ‘suggested’ through a matrilineal line.

This is ruled out, with all the evidence compiled, that it’s not only likely but logical that Mattfried III (von Wied-Engersgau) was related to the Matfrid I, d’Orleans (Manfred V) but instead through the patrilineal line.

Matfrid I, von Wied and Matfrid III, Graf von Eifelgau (d’Orleans) dates are very similar.

Wikapedia states: “The third Matfrid, presumed son of the second, was active in the period 867 to 878″ (ref. 1b)

In the, ‘Medieval Germany: An Encyclopedia‘, it states: “Matfrid III, the son of Matfrid II, flourished 867-878 as a count in Lotharingia and also in Eifelgau. He appears to have property in the part of Lothar II’s realm that went to Charles the Bald in 870, probably in the Waberngau and in the Verduner Gau. In 877, with other magnates he was appointed at Queirzy as counselor to Charle’s son, as often as he should be in the Meuse region. Matfrid III followed his father as lay abbot St. Vaast, and died about 883.” (ref. 2b)

Matfrid I, von Wied is cited to have been born between 850-860 and that he died around 886 that is only a three year difference between both Matfrid’s date of death. Neither Matrfrid (Matfrid I, von Wied or Matfrid III, von Eifelgau (d’Orleans) has a specific or set date for their death. Due to the lack of information and/or evidence, there’s really not a good reason, to believe they are or were different people.

(Well, unless your a descendant of the Hapsburg’s :P)

As if we weren’t deep enough into bizarre common attributes and seemingly coincidental mirrored numerical values we stumble upon, yet another ‘Manfredingi’, grand son of ‘Manfred V‘… Manfredo VII conte di Lodi e Milano, Conte del Sacro Palazzo d’Italia- Count of the ‘Sacred Place’ in Italy. Who was born around 850 (same asMatfried I, Graf von Wied) and died when? You guessed it, in 886!

Manfredo VII conte di Lodi e Milano AKA: Manfredo, Marquis di Lombardia; AKA: Matfried I, Graf von Wied (AKA: Matfrède III, Graf von Eifelgau). Born about 85O in Italy, is presumed to have been at least 15 years of age by the time his son Manfredo was born. Married before 866. He died in 886 in Italy, rather he was beheaded in the year 886 by Lambert.

Matfrid I (Manfred V), von Eifelgau Compte d´Orléans

“Ipotesi sull’origine ei filii Manfredingi”

See: Descendants of Matfried comte d’Orleans at MedLands.

Parentage Unknown- Maybe…

Suggested parents: Guagenfred, comte de Verdun and Theudelinda of Kent.

Well it’s known, you just have to keep sifting and cross referencing until you find the common denominators. In many substantiated, unsubstantiated online sources it is said that Adrien, Comte d’Orléans (Udalriching), Count of Orléans and Waldrada von Hornbach was Matfrid I (Manfred V), d’Orlean’s parents. This was not a ‘made-up’ theory, instigated by ignorant people, it was actually suggested by ‘Academia’, to be the most plausible father based on the limited information available.

So, I accepted this possibility with some reservation. Throughout this research, the evidence of multiple instances of confusing and obscuring the lineage, were encountered. If it happened once or even twice you could assume it to be human error but more than three times… I don’t think so. It is more than obvious that this is a deliberate attempt to eliminate competition at the time this line and other parallel lines are competing for familial elevation and tenure.

The question then is, ‘why… Why this line in particular?’

That is the pestering question that haunts my ongoing research. Again, as before, amid frustration with prayer and quiet meditation God has pointed the way- God being Love, then Love has pointed the way… A love of my familial heritage and ancestors.

‘Manfred III (Manfred V)’ and Matfried I d’Orleans Connection and Parentage

Manfred V, Comte d’Orleans, Duca di Neustria d’Italia, Duca di Tuscia was born in 770, while Matfrid I Graf von Eifelgau, Comte d’Orleans has conflicting dates of 795 or 800. This is easy to understand when you cross reference and compare each ‘Manfredingi’.

First, the 795 date is simply misunderstood information, 795 was symbolic of birth, or rebirth for Manfred V, Comte d’Orleans because this is the date his father ‘Guagenfred I, Comte de Verdum‘ died; and being Catholic, probably went through a public, ceremonial baptismal inauguration (symbolic of birth or re-birth), shortly after his father’s death in 795. The 800 date is also, easily understood, because this is the date Manfred V, d’Orleansofficially assumed the title ‘Comte d’Orleans’.

Matfrid I, Graf von Eifelgau (d’Orleans), in some sources, is said to have been denied his hold on the title ‘Comte d’Orleans’, while, Manfred V, Comte d’Orleans is said to have resigned the post and title. Both ‘Matfrid I‘ and ‘Manfred V‘ not only held the Matfrid (Manfred) name but also the title ‘Comte d’Orleans’ simultaneously. Which is uncanny, to say the least, not to mention, ‘Matfrid I‘ and ‘Manfred V‘ both died in Italy in 836, even more uncanny…

Aripert II di Lombardia, King of the Lombards

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aripert_II

Aripert II (also spelled Aribert) was the king of the Lombards from 701 to 712. Duke of Turin and son of King Raginpert, and thus a scion of the Bavarian Dynasty, he was associated with the throne as early as 700. He was removed by Liutpert, who reigned from 700 to 702, with the exception of the year 701, when Raginpert seized the throne. After his father’s death, he tried to take the throne, too. He defeated Liutpert and the regent Ansprand’s men at Pavia and captured the king, whom he later had strangled in his bath. He seized the capital and forced Ansprand over the Alps. He was firmly in power by 703.

He thence reigned uninterrupted until his death. His reign was a troubled one. In 703, Faroald, duke of Spoleto, attacked the Exarchate of Ravenna, but Aripert refused to assist him, for he wanted good relations with papacy and empire. He tried nevertheless to assert his authority over Spoleto and Benevento in the Mezzogiorno. He nursed friendship with Pope John VI by donating vast tracts of land in the Cottian Alps to the Holy See. This friendship helped him little, for he had many rebellions to deal with and many Slovene raids into Venetia.

In 711, Ansprand, whom he had exiled, returned with a large army from the duke of Bavaria, Theudebert. Many Austrians (the men of Venetia and the east) joined the returning regent and battle was joined by Pavia. Aripert fled to his capital when the tide went against him, but he horded the treasures and tried to cross over into Gaul by night. He drowned in the River Ticino and Ansprand was acclaimed sovereign. He was the last Bavarian to wear the Iron Crown.

Alternate Story

Reginbert 1: King of the Lombards in Italy (r 700).

He was Duke of Turin before succeeding as King. On the death of his cousin, King Cunnincpert I in 700, he rose in rebellion and marched eastward with a strong army and met Ansprand, the guardian of the Boy King Luitpert on the plain of Novara. He defeated Ansprand and his allies and won the crown. However he died three months later, he had two sons- Aripert and Gumbert.

Gumbert, Prince of the Lombard’s

Born ca: 665, and died in France in Exile in 700, at an unknown date. On the death of their father in 700, Gumbert’s elder brother Aripert II succeeded to the throne, but he had to fight Ansprand and his allies for the throne and Aripert being Victorious, Ansprand fled, leaving his family behind. King Aripert II in revenge , mutilated Ansprand’s wife and one of their daughters.

Ansprand returned with an army in 712, and was Victorious, and Aripert II was advised by his supporters to flee to France and raise an army to fight for his throne, however he was drowned crossing the river Tecino.

Gumbert made it successfully to France with his three sons, fearing that Ansparnd would take revenge on his sons, for what his brother Aripert had done to his wife and daughter.

It was his great grandson Manfred V (Matfrid I, von Eifelgau), Comte de Orleans, who in 834 returned to Italy on the request of his nephew, King Lothaire I, King of Italy (Future Emperor).

Basic Facts:
1. Were a line of Nobles of subalpine Italy stemming from Manfred V (or Matfrid I Comte von Eifelgau), Comte de Orleans (765–836)
2. Manfred V inherited the title Comte de Orleans in 800 from a separate (extinguished) line of the family founder
3. Branches of the family included the Guasco, the Boidi and the Trotti
4. In 712 AD Aripert II, Prince of the Lombard’s, was forced to flee his holdings in Northern Italy, along with his family count forbears.
===== Matfried =====
It took a while and many hours of frustration, prayer and persistence. Many times you want to throw your hands up in the air and just quit but that is when ‘Passion’ takes over. Genealogy, is mainly a jigsaw puzzle to be solved by logical and deductive reasoning.

After spending two weeks and sixteen hour days, getting little to no sleep, cross referencing every suggested, possible and/or logical relation, sifting historical data and crunching all the numbers… It finally became apparent, [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-II-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151257772 Mattfrid II, Graf von Eifelgau-Orleans] was the only logical person to be the father of [http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Mattfrid I, von Wied (Same person as Matfrid III, Graf von Eifelgau)].

But first let us jump back to a later descendant.

[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-III-Graf-zu-Wied/6000000020802284608 Matfried III, von Wied (Engersgau, 1093-1123/1129)], had, yet another road block, in this line. He ([http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-III-Graf-zu-Wied/6000000020802284608 Matfrid III]) had, from multiple sources, three fathers to chose from: [A] [http://www.geni.com/people/Ruckerus-von-Wied/6000000020814941815 Ruckerus von Wied]; [B] [http://www.geni.com/people/Wigger-III-im-Engersgau-Beilstein/6000000011196917359 Wigger III von Engersgau (Beilstein)];
[C] [http://www.geni.com/people/Richwin-IV-Graf-von-Wied/6000000020802709328?through=6000000020814941815 Richwin IV, Graf von Wied].

Having dealt with [http://www.geni.com/people/Ruckerus-von-Wied/6000000020814941815 ‘Ruckerus’] and deduced that, while he could be [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-III-Graf-zu-Wied/6000000020802284608 Matfrid III’s] father, it was more likely, [http://www.geni.com/people/Richwin-IV-Graf-von-Wied/6000000020802709328?through=6000000020814941815 Richwin IV, Graf von Wied], was his father. Then in the ‘[http://books.google.com/books?id=0Sdo1gNF4D8C&pg=PA1497&lpg=PA1497&dq=matfrid+III.+of+orleans&source=bl&ots=XlPqjnOKLf&sig=cfpqg_YVxnqBaFUvTGj-UpQo66A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=V3uqUej6C9DoiwKGs4DYBQ&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=matfrid%20III.%20of%20orleans&f=false Medieval Germany: An Encyclopedia]’ (ref. 2b), it made the claim [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-III-Graf-zu-Wied/6000000020802284608 Mattfried III ( von Wied, also Engersgau )] was the son of [http://www.geni.com/people/Wigger-III-im-Engersgau-Beilstein/6000000011196917359 Wigger III von Engersgau]- to justify the ‘Engersgau’ surname. It further stated (Pg. 824) that ‘He’ ([http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-III-Graf-zu-Wied/6000000020802284608 Mattfried III]) was related to the [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid’s (d’Orleans)] but ‘suggested’ through a matrilineal line.

This is ruled out, with all the evidence compiled, that it’s not only likely but logical that [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-III-Graf-zu-Wied/6000000020802284608 Mattfried III (von Wied-Engersgau)] was related to the [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid I, d’Orleans (Manfred V)] but instead through the patrilineal line.

[http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfrid I, von Wied] and [http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfrid III, Graf von Eifelgau (d’Orleans)] dates are very similar.

Wikapedia states:” “The third [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matfrid Matfrid], presumed son of the second, was active in the period 867 to 878″”
(ref. 1b)

In the, ‘[http://books.google.com/books?id=0Sdo1gNF4D8C&pg=PA1497&lpg=PA1497&dq=matfrid+III.+of+orleans&source=bl&ots=XlPqjnOKLf&sig=cfpqg_YVxnqBaFUvTGj-UpQo66A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=V3uqUej6C9DoiwKGs4DYBQ&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=matfrid%20III.%20of%20orleans&f=false Medieval Germany: An Encyclopedia]’, it states: ””Matfrid III, the son of Matfrid II, flourished 867-878 as a count in Lotharingia and also in Eifelgau. He appears to have property in the part of Lothar II’s realm that went to Charles the Bald in 870, probably in the Waberngau and in the Verduner Gau. In 877, with other magnates he was appointed at Queirzy as counselor to Charle’s son, as often as he should be in the Meuse region. Matfrid III followed his father as lay abbot St. Vaast, and died about 883.” ”
(ref. 2b)

[http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfrid I, von Wied] is cited to have been born between 850-860 and that he died around 886 that is only a three year difference between both Matfrid’s date of death. Neither Matrfrid ([http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfrid I, von Wied] or [http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfrid III, von Eifelgau (d’Orleans)] has a specific or set date for their death. Due to the lack of information and/or evidence, there’s really not a good reason, to believe they are or were different people.

===== (Well, unless your a descendant of the Hapsburg’s :P) =====

As if we weren’t deep enough into bizarre common attributes and seemingly coincidental mirrored numerical values we stumble upon, yet another ‘Manfredingi’, grand son of ‘[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V]’… Manfredo VII conte di Lodi e Milano, Conte del Sacro Palazzo d’Italia- Count of the ‘Sacred Place’ in Italy. Who was born around 850 (same as [http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfried I, Graf von Wied]) and died when? You guessed it, in 886!

Manfredo VII conte di Lodi e Milano AKA: Manfredo, Marquis di Lombardia; AKA: [http://www.geni.com/people/Matfr%C3%A8de-III-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000003051286591 Matfried I, Graf von Wied (AKA: Matfrède III, Graf von Eifelgau)]. Born about 85O in Italy, is presumed to have been at least 15 years of age by the time his son Manfredo was born. Married before 866. He died in 886 in Italy, rather he was beheaded in the year 886 by Lambert.

=== Matfrid I (Manfred V), von Eifelgau Compte d´Orléans ===
”“Ipotesi sull’origine ei filii Manfredingi””

See: [http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/FRANKISH%20NOBILITY.htm#_Toc169575361 Descendants of Matfried comte d’Orleans] at MedLands.

=== Parentage Unknown- Maybe… ===

Suggested parents: ”'[http://www.geni.com/people/Guagenfred-I-Comte-de-Verdum/6000000020958773698 Guagenfred, comte de Verdun]”’ and ”'[http://www.geni.com/people/Princess-Theudelinda-de-Verdum/6000000020959363839 Theudelinda of Kent]”’.

Well it’s known, you just have to keep sifting and cross referencing until you find the common denominators. In many substantiated, unsubstantiated online sources it is said that [http://www.geni.com/people/Adrien-Comte-d-Orl%C3%A9ans/6000000007316403023 Adrien, Comte d’Orléans (Udalriching), Count of Orléans] and [http://www.geni.com/people/Waldrada-von-Hornbach/6000000003827237317?through=6000000007316403023 Waldrada von Hornbach] was [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid I (Manfred V), d’Orlean’s] parents. This was not a ‘made-up’ theory, instigated by ignorant people, it was actually suggested by ‘Academia’, to be the most plausible father based on the limited information available.

So, I accepted this possibility with some reservation. Throughout this research, the evidence of multiple instances of confusing and obscuring the lineage, were encountered. If it happened once or even twice you could assume it to be human error but more than three times… I don’t think so. It is more than obvious that this is a deliberate attempt to eliminate competition at the time this line and other parallel lines are competing for familial elevation and tenure.

The question then is, ‘why… Why this line in particular?’

That is the pestering question that haunts my ongoing research. Again, as before, amid frustration with prayer and quiet meditation God has pointed the way- God being Love, then Love has pointed the way… A love of my familial heritage and ancestors.

=== ‘Manfred III (Manfred V)’ and Matfried I d’Orleans Connection and Parentage ===

[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V, Comte d’Orleans, Duca di Neustria d’Italia, Duca di Tuscia] was born in 770, while [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid I Graf von Eifelgau, Comte d’Orleans] has conflicting dates of 795 or 800. This is easy to understand when you cross reference and compare each ‘Manfredingi’.

First, the 795 date is simply misunderstood information, 795 was symbolic of birth, or rebirth for [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V, Comte d’Orleans] because this is the date his father ‘[http://www.geni.com/people/Guagenfred-I-Comte-de-Verdum/6000000020958773698 Guagenfred I, Comte de Verdum]’ died; and being Catholic, probably went through a public, ceremonial baptismal inauguration (symbolic of birth or re-birth), shortly after his father’s death in 795. The 800 date is also, easily understood, because this is the date [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V, d’Orleans] officially assumed the title ‘Comte d’Orleans’.

[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid I, Graf von Eifelgau (d’Orleans)], in some sources, is said to have been denied his hold on the title ‘Comte d’Orleans’, while, [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V, Comte d’Orleans] is said to have resigned the post and title. Both ‘[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid I]’ and ‘[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V]’ not only held the Matfrid (Manfred) name but also the title ‘Comte d’Orleans’ simultaneously. Which is uncanny, to say the least, not to mention, ‘[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Matfrid I]’ and ‘[http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V]’ both died in Italy in 836, even more uncanny…

===Aripert II di Lombardia, King of the Lombards===
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aripert_II

Aripert II (also spelled Aribert) was the king of the Lombards from 701 to 712. Duke of Turin and son of King Raginpert, and thus a scion of the Bavarian Dynasty, he was associated with the throne as early as 700. He was removed by Liutpert, who reigned from 700 to 702, with the exception of the year 701, when Raginpert seized the throne. After his father’s death, he tried to take the throne, too. He defeated Liutpert and the regent Ansprand’s men at Pavia and captured the king, whom he later had strangled in his bath. He seized the capital and forced Ansprand over the Alps. He was firmly in power by 703.

He thence reigned uninterrupted until his death. His reign was a troubled one. In 703, Faroald, duke of Spoleto, attacked the Exarchate of Ravenna, but Aripert refused to assist him, for he wanted good relations with papacy and empire. He tried nevertheless to assert his authority over Spoleto and Benevento in the Mezzogiorno. He nursed friendship with Pope John VI by donating vast tracts of land in the Cottian Alps to the Holy See. This friendship helped him little, for he had many rebellions to deal with and many Slovene raids into Venetia.

In 711, Ansprand, whom he had exiled, returned with a large army from the duke of Bavaria, Theudebert. Many Austrians (the men of Venetia and the east) joined the returning regent and battle was joined by Pavia. Aripert fled to his capital when the tide went against him, but he horded the treasures and tried to cross over into Gaul by night. He drowned in the River Ticino and Ansprand was acclaimed sovereign. He was the last Bavarian to wear the Iron Crown.
===Alternate Story===

Reginbert 1: King of the Lombards in Italy (r 700).

He was Duke of Turin before succeeding as King. On the death of his cousin, King Cunnincpert I in 700, he rose in rebellion and marched eastward with a strong army and met Ansprand, the guardian of the Boy King Luitpert on the plain of Novara. He defeated Ansprand and his allies and won the crown. However he died three months later, he had two sons- Aripert and Gumbert.

Gumbert, Prince of the Lombard’s

Born ca: 665, and died in France in Exile in 700, at an unknown date. On the death of their father in 700, Gumbert’s elder brother Aripert II succeeded to the throne, but he had to fight Ansprand and his allies for the throne and Aripert being Victorious, Ansprand fled, leaving his family behind. King Aripert II in revenge , mutilated Ansprand’s wife and one of their daughters.

Ansprand returned with an army in 712, and was Victorious, and Aripert II was advised by his supporters to flee to France and raise an army to fight for his throne, however he was drowned crossing the river Tecino.

Gumbert made it successfully to France with his three sons, fearing that Ansparnd would take revenge on his sons, for what his brother Aripert had done to his wife and daughter.

It was his great grandson [http://www.geni.com/people/Mattfried-I-Graf-von-Eifelgau/6000000007151327775 Manfred V (Matfrid I, von Eifelgau), Comte de Orleans], who in 834 returned to Italy on the request of his nephew, King Lothaire I, King of Italy (Future Emperor).

===Basic Facts:===
# Were a line of ‘Blood Royals’ and Nobles of subalpine Italy stemming from Manfred V (or Matfrid I Comte von Eifelgau), Comte de Orleans (765–836)

# Manfred V inherited the title Comte de Orleans in 800 from a separate (extinguished) line of the family founder

# Branches of the family included the Guasco, the Boidi and the Trotti
# In 712 AD Aripert II, Prince of the Lombard’s, was forced to flee his holdings in Northern Italy, along with his family count forbears.
Weekly Rietstap’s Armorial General

May 21st, 2013

4) Sächsische Orginal Wappen | Historische Abbildungen: Page 172 (von Blancenburg)

4) Sächsische Orginal Wappen | Historische Abbildungen: Page 172 (von Blancenburg)

1)Sächsisches WAPPENBUCH – Heraldik – Orginal Wappen des Adels aus Sachsen: Page 167 (von Cram)

2)Sächsisches WAPPENBUCH – Heraldik – Orginal Wappen des Adels aus Sachsen: Page 167 (von Kage)

3) Sächsisches WAPPENBUCH – Heraldik – Orginal Wappen des Adels aus Sachsen: 169 (von Kohler)

5) Bayrische, Sächsische, Hessische, Schlesische, Österreichische Orginal Wappen | Historische Abbildungen: Page 16 (von Lowenstein)